• Filter Events
1974

APTA approves nine-point tiebreak

Back to Top
It’s not tennis, it’s not ping-pong, and its booming. 
Article written by John P. Ware for Travel & Leisure
It’s not tennis, it’s not ping-pong, and its booming. Article written by John P. Ware for Travel & Leisure

The tiebreak was to be played at 6-all. The APTA newsletter, Off The Wire, carried the details: “1. The nine-point tiebreak is played when games reach 6-all. 2. The player whose turn it is to serve the next regular game is the first server. This is always the same player who started serving the set. 3. The team that wins 5 points is the winner of the set. The set is scored 7-6. 4. Each player must serve from the same end of the court in the tiebreak that he or she has served from during the set. (Note that this alters the sequence of serving by the partners on the second serving team.) For illustration, with the serving team designated as Players A and B, and their opponents as C and D, the service order is as follows: Points 1 & 2 are served by player A. Player A is always the player who started serving the set. TEAMS DO NOT CHANGE COURTS Points 3 & 4[...]

Read More
1974

Gloria Dillenbeck named first Executive Secretary

Back to Top
Ethel Kennedy (center) presents the trophy at the 1971 Women's Nationals in Chevy Chase, Maryland, to (from left) B. J. Debree, Gloria Dillenbeck, Peggy Stanton, and Charlotte Lee.
Ethel Kennedy (center) presents the trophy at the 1971 Women's Nationals in Chevy Chase, Maryland, to (from left) B. J. Debree, Gloria Dillenbeck, Peggy Stanton, and Charlotte Lee.

The APTA named Gloria Dillenbeck as the first full-time Executive Secretary. Raised in Montclair, NJ, Dillenbeck began playing platform tennis in 1966 and had been a star varsity tennis player at Swarthmore College. With her partner, B.J. Debree, they were the first team to challenge the dynasty of Charlotte Lee and Peggy Stanton (National Champions 1967-1970) and won the Nationals in three successive years—1971, 1972, and 1973. Gloria Dillenbeck Dodd was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2007.

Read More
1974

Ball draws criticism – more controversial than foot-faults!

Back to Top

The APTA Newsletter Off The Wire reported that the most controversial issue during the previous season (and that included foot-faults!) was the differences among the four APTA approved balls. The article continued, “This one bounces too lively, that one warms up too slowly, the next one comes apart at the seams, etc. etc. etc. The Marcraft ball seems to have won high marks for playability, and some of the women's tournaments actually publicized that ‘by popular demand’ the event was using Marcraft balls. Well, hold on to your prejudices, because we're about to start a whole new ball game. Don Macrae, Grand Vizier of Equipment, has tightened up the specs for the coming season, and the manufacturers have all been advised to make a ball that is both lighter and less bouncy. Several of them have already submitted new batches for testing, and Don reports that the suppliers are being [...]

Read More
1974

What’s in a name? Platform Tennis, Paddle Tennis are they the same?

Back to Top

In 1974, several letters to the editor of The New York Times surfaced about the name confusion between platform tennis and paddle tennis. Burling Lowrey of Washington, D.C., and Dick Squires exchanged pecks as proponents for their respective games. The exchange, however, was broader in scope than just the name conflict. The Mid-Summer edition of the APTA newsletter, Off The Wire, had this to say: It is not the intent of the APTA to enter the crossfire, but simply to set the record straight for our readers who may have read one or both of the letters, because both gentlemen are guilty of errors of fact. Mr. Lowrey referred to the invention of platform tennis by a “group of Scarsdale millionaires,” one of the standard forms of jabs at platform tennis' supposed snobbishness. In fact, neither Blanchard nor Cogswell were millionaires. Far from attempting to foster[...]

Read More
1974

APTA’s ball standards revised

Back to Top

The APTA reported that all four of the approved ball suppliers met the new, tougher standards and that they now had their own testing capability, so if any balls became sub-standard during the season they could be “unapproved.” The new balls were lighter and less bouncy and a yellow ball was approved for night play. The approved suppliers were Barr, Vittert, Beconta, Inc. (a division of Puma), and Marcraft. The APTA set forth the new ball standards: I. BOUNCE TEST FOR REBOUND Balls are conditioned at 70 degrees for 24 hours, then dropped from 90 inches to a concrete slab, and the rebound is measured. Standard Rebound: 40 inches; Acceptable Tolerance: 38" to 42" II. WEIGHT TEST Standard Weight: 72.5 Grams; Acceptable Tolerance: 70 to 75 grams III. DIAMETER TEST Measure diameter along two perpendicular axes of the ball. Both readings must be within tolerance. [...]

Read More
1974

First Platform Tennis Rule Book published

Back to Top
The Official Rules of Platform Tennis published
The Official Rules of Platform Tennis published

Bill Ballard spearheaded this initiative with assistance from Bob Brown. Prior to the publication of this book the guidance on platform tennis rules simply stated: “The rules of platform tennis are the same as for tennis except for the one serve rule and play off the wires etc.” The new Rule Book provided a comprehensive review of all the rules and regulations governing play. The book was so well received that the first printing run of 6,000 copies quickly disappeared, necessitating a second printing in 1975. The rules allowed a let to be played if a ball hit the crossbar, the angular beam between the side screen and the back screen which were standard on courts at the time. Eagle-eyed umpires who spotted an apparent ambiguity on this position involving Rules 2, 13, and 19, were informed that the overriding ruling was to be found at 13 (d), to wit, if the ball hits a cross[...]

Read More
1974

APTA addresses foot-faults

Back to Top

In order to discourage foot-faults, the partner of the receiver was now empowered to call them against the server. This experimental rule was based on a Jack Stahr "Decisions" column from the July 1973 issue of World Tennis. The intent of the APTA was to evaluate the rule over the coming season to see if it should be confirmed or discarded. The appropriate section of this ruling was as follows: Question: “…who is entitled to call foot-faults?” Ruling: " …..simply call a few of those services 'faults' under a broad interpretation of the official Explanation under Rule 8, which says that 'it is customary for the Receiver to determine whether the service is good or a fault.' (If it is illegally delivered, it is a fault.) This might not be the most sociable thing to do, but consider the unsociable effect that legal servers experience upon seeing their opponents take unfair[...]

Read More
1974

Change to rule for ball over the screen

Back to Top

Previously, when a ball went over the screen, the point had been played as a let. Under the new rule, approved by the APTA Board in September, the striker lost the point outright. The Board intended to evaluate the rule over the coming season to see if it should be confirmed or discarded. It was later confirmed.

Read More
1974

Umpires Committee established

Back to Top

Prompted by increasing concern about line calls and foot-faulting, APTA President Robert Brown formed a committee to advise and recommend steps to cope with these matters. The committee recommended the establishment of an Umpires Committee, whose function would be to post line judges to make out calls and any foot-fault calls. The APTA concurred with the recommendation. Paul Malloy, Paul Sullivan and Brook Kindred, from Fox Meadow formed the nucleus, along with renowned tennis umpires Jack Stahr and Mike Dunne.

Read More
1974

The Complete Book of Platform Tennis published

Back to Top

Edited by Dick Squires, this was one of a number of books he edited or wrote. Squires was a great promoter of the game. Squires was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2003.

Read More
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12